Endocrine immune-related adverse events in patients with metastatic renal and urothelial cancer treated with immune checkpoint-inhibitors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence, diagnosis and treatment of immune-related adverse events (e-irAE) of checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). METHODS: A retrospective, single-center study was conducted to identify a cohort that received ICI for mUC or mRCC. e-irAE were classified according to the CTCAE V.5.0. Patients received ICI for mUC or mCC between 01/2017 and 03/2021. A retrospective chart review was performed. T-Test, the chi-squared test, and Fisher's exact test were performed. RESULTS: 102 Patients received ICI [mUC: 40 (39%), mRCC: 62 (61%)]. 64 (63%) received an ICI monotherapy, 27 (27%) a dual ICI therapy, 11 (11%) a combination with VEGFi. e-irAE occurred in 19 (19%) patients [grade 1-2: 17 (84%), grade 3: 3 (16%)]. The median time until e-irAE was 42 days (range 11-211 days). 14 Patients developed thyroidism (14%), 4 (4%) a hypophysitis, 1 (1%) an adrenal insufficiency (AI). 7 patients (7%) had to discontinue ICI therapy [hypophysitis (100%), AI (100%), thyroidism (14%)]. 6 (86%) received cortisone. After a median range of 34 days 5 patients (71%) restarted ICI therapy. All patients (n = 4) with hypophysitis continued ICI [4 (100%) prednisone, 3 (75%) levothyroxine]. 11 (79%) presented with hyperthyroidism. 4 (37%) needed therapy (1 (7%) prednisone, 3 (21%) thiamazole, 2 (14%) beta blocker). The 9 (64%) patients with hypothyroidism received levothyroxine. Hypophysitis appears only on dual ICI (CTLA-4/PD-1) inhibition (p 0.007). CONCLUSION: This study shows the importance of adequate diagnosis and therapy of e-irAEs.

Prophylactic ECMO during TAVI in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction.

BACKGROUND: This study investigated the impact of prophylactic veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (pECMO) in patients with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (dLVEF) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Out of 1490 patients undergoing TAVI at two centers (2010-2015), 222 patients had dLVEF (≤ 40%). Of these, 21 patients (10%) underwent TAVI with pECMO. Complications and outcome according to pECMO were analyzed in the entire and in a propensity-matched population. RESULTS: In the entire population, patients with pECMO had a higher logEuroScore I (33% ± 19 vs. 25% ± 17; p = 0.037), worse LVEF (26% ± 7 vs. 32% ± 7; p = 0.001), more major bleedings (29% vs. 9%; p = 0.015), higher transfusion rate (30% vs. 10%; p = 0.019) and longer in-hospital stay (9.0 [7.0;14.0] vs. 7.0 [5.0;10.0] days; p = 0.024). After propensity matching only transfusion rate remained higher with pECMO (30% vs. 7%; p = 0.025). In the entire population, rate and risk of 30-day mortality was higher with pECMO (24% vs. 6%, HR 95%CI 4.29 [1.51-12.19]; p = 0.006). In the matched population, this effect was attenuated (24% vs. 12%, HR 95%CI 2.09 [0.61-7.23]; p = 0.243). Cumulative rate and risk of 1-year mortality did not differ in the entire (log-rank p = 0.069; 39% vs. 22%, HR 95%CI 1.99 [0.94-4.24]; p = 0.074) nor in the matched population (log-rank p = 0.520; 39% vs. 31%, HR 95%CI 1.34 [0.55-3.28]; p = 0.523). CONCLUSION: In patients with dLVEF undergoing TAVI, periprocedural pECMO support does not seem to improve patient outcome.